Sanaf AI Solutions vs Viktor
The short answer: Viktor is one shared AI assistant your whole team talks to in Slack or Teams. Sanaf is one AI employee too, but it is hired into jobs: every job comes with a written job description, rules you set per kind of action, and a trial period before it acts alone. Both are self-serve and both ask before anything they cannot undo. The differences are how the work is held and how you pay. Viktor sells a monthly plan of shared workspace credits. Sanaf sells credit you buy when you need it, with nothing that renews on its own. If your team is technical, lives in Slack, and wants to delegate varied desk work to one place, Viktor is a strong pick. If you want an employee that holds a job, works on its own schedule, and can be trusted with different things in different ways, choose Sanaf.
Last updated 2026-10-25. Competitor details describe their model, not their current plans or prices; check their site for those.
Read from Viktor’s own pages on 2026-10-25: Homepage, Pricing page, Changelog.
An illustration of how the conversation reads, not a transcript from a client account.
Viktor launched publicly in early 2026 and grew fast for a reason: you mention it in Slack, describe a task, and it does the work across a very large catalog of connected apps, then hands back a finished document, spreadsheet, or dashboard. It also runs scheduled tasks, learns procedures from a screen recording, and proposes automations from what it sees in your workspace. As a shared assistant for a team that already works in Slack, it is genuinely good.
Both products now promise the same safety basics. Viktor asks before anything it cannot undo, puts approval buttons on irreversible actions, and keeps saved logins private to the person who added them unless they choose to share. The differences are elsewhere. Viktor is one general assistant shaped by whatever you type. Sanaf takes each job separately: a written job description, its own logins, and rules set per kind of action, so one job can act on its own while another still asks first. And the bill works differently. Viktor runs on a monthly plan. On Sanaf you buy credit as you need it.
How the two models differ
| Dimension | Sanaf AI Solutions | Viktor |
|---|---|---|
| What you get | Sanaf AI Solutions: One AI employee with a written job description for every job you hand it | Viktor: One shared assistant for the whole workspace |
| Where it works | Sanaf AI Solutions: Slack, Microsoft Teams, and its own chat in the console | Viktor: Slack, Teams, Discord, and a web app |
| How work starts | Sanaf AI Solutions: A person asks, a schedule fires, or something arrives in an app it watches | Viktor: A person mentions it, or a scheduled task runs |
| App credentials | Sanaf AI Solutions: Scoped to the job, one app at a time, revocable one at a time | Viktor: Saved logins private to the person who added them by default, with an option to share one with the workspace |
| Approvals | Sanaf AI Solutions: Per kind of action: do it, ask, or never, with conditions; stricter when unattended | Viktor: Asks before anything it cannot undo, with approval buttons and an always-approve option per tool |
| Trial period | Sanaf AI Solutions: Each job starts by asking first, and you allow one kind of action at a time, per job | Viktor: The same approval rules from the first message, set per tool rather than per job |
| Self-learning | Sanaf AI Solutions: Proposes changes to its own instructions with citations; you approve; every change is versioned | Viktor: Writes skills and notes from its work and from screen recordings you give it |
| Pricing model | Sanaf AI Solutions: Free to start with $120 of credit and no card, then credits from $20 as you need them. They never expire, and you pay for the work, not per seat | Viktor: A free credit grant with no expiry date, then a monthly plan of shared workspace credits; unused plan credits roll over one month, and top-ups can be capped |
| Compliance today | Sanaf AI Solutions: SOC 2 through the connection layer and hosting; our own audit is planned | Viktor: Its own SOC 2 Type 1 report, with Type 2 and ISO 27001 in progress |
| Best for | Sanaf AI Solutions: Owners who want a colleague with a job, rules, and a trial period | Viktor: Slack-native teams who want to delegate varied desk work themselves |
Choose Viktor if
- Your team already lives in Slack or Teams and wants to delegate varied, one-off desk work by mentioning an assistant.
- You want to build things: internal tools, dashboards, code, and reports, produced from a chat message.
- You want a very large connected-app catalog and a browser it can drive, today.
- You are happy with a monthly plan, or your security review needs the vendor’s own SOC 2 report today.
Choose Sanaf AI Solutions if
- You want a hire that works the inbox and the calendar on its own schedule, not only when someone mentions it.
- You want rules that differ by kind of action, and logins scoped to the job, so one connection never means everything.
- You want a trial period where it drafts and you review before it sends anything.
- You want to buy credit only when you need it, from $20, with nothing that renews on its own, and credit you buy never expires.
Frequently asked
Is Sanaf a Viktor alternative?
Where does each one work?
How does pricing differ?
Can I run both?
On these lists
Other comparisons
Not ready to hire yet?
Follow along instead. Field notes on what an AI employee can take off a team, what it costs to run, and where it still needs a person.