Honest comparison

Sanaf AI Solutions vs 11x

11x is the better buy if your problem is sales pipeline and you want purpose-built digital workers for it, with its outbound worker running across many channels from a large signal stack. Sanaf is the better buy if you want one employee in Slack or Microsoft Teams holding jobs across the whole business, including prospecting, with an approval layer in front of what it sends.

Last updated 2026-09-19. Competitor details describe their model, not their current plans or prices; check their site for those.

Read from 11x’s own pages on 2026-09-19: Company site, which has no public pricing page.

At work

An illustration of how the conversation reads, not a transcript from a client account.

11x frames its products as digital workers rather than tools, which is close to how we describe Sanaf. The difference is scope. 11x builds them for the sales floor: one worker for outbound and another for inbound. That outbound worker filters signals across many data sources to find buyers matching an ICP and writes for each prospect specifically.

Sanaf is one hire for the business rather than several for the sales team. That means less depth in outbound and more coverage everywhere else, and it means the work happens in the channel the team already uses rather than in a sales platform.

Side by side

How the two models differ

Sanaf compared with 11x, by dimension
What you getSanafOne employee, many jobs, one workspace.11xPurpose-built digital workers for sales, outbound and inbound handled by different ones.
Signal and dataSanafWhat you connect. No proprietary buyer database.11xA large multi-source signal stack used to surface buyers matching your ICP.
Where it worksSanafSlack, Microsoft Teams, and its own chat in the console.11xIts own platform, reaching prospects across many channels.
AutonomySanafStarts in shadow mode and is promoted job by job as it earns room.11xPositioned as autonomous and running in the background.
ScopeSanafSales, finance, operations, people and customer jobs from one roster.11xSales.
PricingSanafFree to start with $120 of credit and no card, then credits from $20 as you need them. They never expire, and you pay for the work, not per seat.11xNot published on the site at the time of writing: the route is a demo and a quote.

Choose 11x if

  • Sales pipeline is the problem you are buying for, and you want workers built only for that.
  • You want buyers surfaced from a large signal stack rather than worked from lists you already have.
  • You want outbound and inbound handled by separate purpose-built workers rather than one generalist.
  • A demo-and-quote purchase suits you better than signing up and starting the same afternoon.

Choose Sanaf if

  • You want one hire covering jobs across the business, not several covering sales.
  • You want the work to happen in Slack or Microsoft Teams where the whole team can see it.
  • You want to start today on published pricing rather than wait for a quote.
  • You want it to draft before it sends until you decide otherwise.
Questions

Frequently asked

Is Sanaf a replacement for a dedicated sales worker?
Not if outbound volume is the point. A product built only for sales pipeline, with its own signal stack, will do that job harder. Sanaf makes sense when prospecting sits alongside other jobs you want one hire to hold.
What does 11x cost?
It does not publish pricing on its site as far as we could see, so the route is a demo and a quote. We publish ours because we think you should be able to work out the cost before you talk to anyone.
Can Sanaf work the inbound side too?
It can qualify and route inbound enquiries and book meetings as jobs on the roster. It does that in the channels it lives in rather than as a dedicated inbound product.
Keep comparing

Other comparisons

Not ready to hire yet?

Follow along instead. Field notes on what an AI employee can take off a team, what it costs to run, and where it still needs a person.

Unsubscribe in one click, any time. Privacy policy